Home / Disclosures

Disclosures

The fine print
in one place.

Every disclaimer Veriqa carries — securities, methodology, third-party content, independence, and forward-looking statements — consolidated here so they can be cited canonically and updated in one place.

01 · Securities & investment advice

Decision-support and general information only.

What Veriqa outputs is, and is not, when read against securities and professional-advice rules.

Outputs of Veriqa — including scores, verdicts, evidence rows, briefs, and memos — are decision-support and general information only. They are not investment, financial, legal, tax, security, or medical advice. They are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security, instrument, or other asset, and they are not an offer or solicitation of any security in any jurisdiction.

Any forward-looking statements on this site, in the live demo, in a sample brief, or in a customer report — about future products, markets, technologies, regulatory environments, or outcomes — are subject to risks and uncertainties and may differ materially from actual results. No forward-looking statement should be relied upon as a prediction or guarantee.

02 · Methodology

What the scoring engine is — and what it is not.

Plain language on the nature of the Veriqa scoring engine, so it is never mistaken for a model, a rating, or a peer review.

The Veriqa scoring engine is a transparent rule-based heuristic over text features — evidence density, the balance of hedging versus superlative language, and the presence of benchmarks, baselines, dates, and named entities.

It is not a sentiment score. It is not a statistically validated or machine-learned model: it has no training set, no fitted weights, and no measured error rate, and it makes no claim to predictive accuracy. It is not an academic peer review, an independent audit, or a third-party rating.

The classical-baseline gate — the rule that a Proceed verdict is blocked while any core advantage claim is missing a named benchmark, a stated problem size, or a classical comparator — is enforced in software, not by editorial judgement.

03 · Third-party claims & content

We grade public claims. We are not the source of them.

How Veriqa treats the underlying public material it grades, and the names and marks that appear in it.

Veriqa grades public claims, papers, patents, and roadmaps. We are not responsible for the accuracy of the underlying claim; the verdict reflects the strength of the cited evidence we could find, not the truth of the claim itself.

All third-party names and marks are the property of their respective owners and are used nominatively for identification only. No endorsement or affiliation is implied.

Any competitive or market commentary on this site reflects Quantum Nexus's own opinion as of 2026, is illustrative, and is not a third-party rating, endorsement, or statement of fact about any company.

04 · Independence & conflict of interest

Why our verdicts have nothing to defend.

The structural choices that keep the grade neutral — and the scope lock that keeps it that way.

We do not take equity in companies we grade. We do not run quantum hardware, and we do not own a hardware-vendor stake. If a reviewer has a prior relationship with a graded company, the report is reassigned.

The product is "Path A" — the evidence-grading decision layer. We do not design or execute quantum circuits, and we do not ourselves claim to achieve quantum advantage. Veriqa evaluates the advantage claims that others make.

05 · Reviewer gate

Software-enforced — and precisely scoped.

What the reviewer gate actually represents, and what it does not.

Every customer-facing report stays in draft until an internal reviewer approves it. The software enforces the gate — a report cannot be released around it — and reviewers are held to a written credential standard (a graduate degree in quantum information, physics, or applied cryptography, or equivalent hands-on grading experience).

We do not yet represent that an independent outside expert reviews every report. For high-stakes decisions we recommend independent expert review on your side in addition to ours.

06 · Illustrative figures

If it is on the public site, it is an example — not an assessment.

How Veriqa labels public examples versus real customer work.

Any data, score, verdict, evidence row, claim, or memo presented on this site, in the live demo, or in a sample brief, is marked "Illustrative" or "Sample" and represents a synthetic example, not a real assessment of any actual company, paper, or program.

Real reports go to customers under engagement; they are not shown publicly without explicit permission.

07 · Entity & jurisdiction

The named legal entity behind every report.

Who you are dealing with, and where to send formal notice.

Veriqa™ is a product of Quantum Nexus Technologies Ltd (Cayman Islands), a subsidiary of Lakeside Holding Limited (Nasdaq: LSH).

Notice address and registered office available on request via hello@quantum-nexus.dev.

08 · Last reviewed

When this page was last looked at, end to end.

Last reviewed: 2026-06-08

Material changes are dated on /changelog.html under the "Methodology" or "Security" filter.

The companion legal pages.

The disclosures above are the canonical text. For the rest of the legal surface — privacy practices, binding terms, the trust posture, and dated changes — see the dedicated pages.