One evidence engine.
Four decisions it defends.

Every Veriqa engagement runs the same discipline — claims graded against a classical baseline, every line sourced, nothing reaching a Proceed verdict without a comparator. What changes is the decision in front of you. Pick the one you own.

Request a brief How the grading works

01 · Choose your decision

Four fronts, one referee.

Each solution is a first-class engagement with its own inputs, outputs and buyer — built on the same neutral evidence layer.

Investors & corp-dev

Diligence quantum startups, public-company narratives and M&A targets on the evidence — hype-risk scored, baselines demanded, a Proceed / Monitor / Require-further-diligence memo you can put in front of an IC.

Explore investor diligence →

Security / PQC

Turn a cryptographic inventory into a phased post-quantum migration plan mapped to NIST FIPS 203/204/205, prioritised by harvest-now-decrypt-later exposure and data shelf-life.

Explore PQC migration →

Pharma & R&D

Separate AI-assisted design, classical simulation and selective quantum refinement into a conservative, patent-ready evidence package — wet-lab gaps flagged, no overclaiming.

Explore molecular-design evidence →

Defense & dual-use

Map quantum sensing, navigation (PNT), secure comms and dual-use programs to evidence-graded readiness and realistic procurement paths — TRL-honest, hype-free.

Explore defense diligence →

02 · What every engagement shares

The discipline is the product.

Whichever front you are on, the method underneath is identical — that is what makes a Veriqa verdict portable across an IC, a board, a security committee or a program review.

The classical-baseline gate

No advantage claim raises a verdict without a named benchmark, a problem size and a classical comparator. Missing any → it is flagged needs-baseline and cannot reach Proceed. The software enforces it.

Sourced, with confidence

Every line carries a citation and a confidence — how strongly that source supports the sub-claim, not a probability the claim is true. Nothing is asserted on vibes.

Drafted, then reviewed

Every customer-facing report stays in draft until an internal reviewer approves it against a written credential standard. The verdict you receive is one someone is accountable for.

03 · Not sure which fits?

Start from the decision, not the technology.

Deciding whether to back, buy or partner with a quantum company? That is investor & corp-dev diligence — start there.

On the hook for cryptographic risk and a migration clock? That is the PQC / security track.

Evaluating a molecular-design or simulation claim? Pharma & R&D evidence packaging.

Assessing a sensing, PNT, comms or dual-use program? Defense & dual-use readiness.

Still unsure? Send us the company, claim, paper or program and we will tell you which engagement fits — and scope it.

What you get back

A Proceed / Monitor / Require-further-diligence verdict
Three scores: maturity, urgency, hype-risk
An evidence table — every claim sourced & graded
Missing-evidence flags and a validation plan
An auditable, machine-readable export

Bring us the decision you have to defend.

Tell us the company, claim, paper or program. We respond with scope and a fixed price within two business days.

Request a brief See pricing

One evidence engine.Four decisions it defends.